PENGARUH PENDEKATAN PEMBELAJARAN DAN PENGUASAAN SEMANTIK TERHADAP PENINGKATAN PEMAHAMAN MAKNA PUISI (The Influence of Teaching Approach and Semantic Mastery on the Increase of Achievement of Poetry Comprehension)

Kinayati Djojosuroto

Abstract


This article presents a research findings that is intended to determine the influence of teaching approach and semantic mastery on the increase of students’ achievement of poetry
comprehension of the students of the Education of  Language and Literature program of the Language and Art Major of the Manado State University (UNIMA). The teaching approach
as an independent variable is divided into three levels: Gestalt, Structural, and Semiotic. The semantic mastery as an attribute variable is divided into high semantic mastery and low
semantic mastery.  The research method employed in this study was quasi-experiment with before-after design through the factorial of 3 x 2 of the two-way analysis of variance technique (ANAVA). The sample of this research was the students who were studying the poem appreciation subject. Based on the result of inferential analysis of the data, several conclusions may be drawn. First, there is a difference in the increase of achievements of poetry comprehension of the groups of students who are taught using  Gestalt approach, structural approach, and semiotic approach (p <0.05).  Among the three groups, the Gestalt group shows the highest increase. Second, the group of students with high semantic mastery shows a higher increase of achievement in poetry comprehension than those with low semantic mastery (p <0.05).   Third, there is an interaction between teaching approach and semantic mastery in terms of the increase of the students’ achievement (p <0.05).

Keywords


gestalt, structural, semiotic, semantic, poetry comprehension

Full Text:

Pdf

References


Chaer, Abdul. 2004. Pengantar Semantik Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Eagleton, Terry, 2001. Litarary Theory: An Introduction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Good, Thomas L. 2003. Education Psychology, London: Longman.

Hamalik, Oemar. 2000. Mengajar Asas Metode Teknik. Bandung: Pustaka Martina.

Jefferson, Ann. 2003, Structuralism and Post Structuralism. Modern Literary Theory: A Comparative Introduction. London:

Batsford Academic and Educational Ltd.

Lyons, John. 2001, Semantics Vol.1.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sawrey, James, et.al. 2004 . Educational Psichology, London: Open Brooks.

Sudjana. 2005. Metoda statistika, Bandung: Tarsito

Suryabrata, Sumadi. 2003. Psikologi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Tarigan, Henry Guntur, 2000. Prinsip-Prinsip Dasar Sastra, Bandung: Angkasa.

Teeuw, A. 2004. Sastra dan Ilmu Sastra. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.

Verhaar, JWM. 2003. Pengantar Linguistik Umum, Yoyakarta: University Press.

Wallace, Robert. 2007. Writing Poems. Boston, Toronto: Little Brown and Company.

Waluyo, Herman, 2004. Teori dan Apresiasi

Puisi.Jakarta: Erlangga.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26499/salingka.v11i02.19

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 SALINGKA

Salingka publish by Balai Bahasa Provinsi Sumatera Barat - Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa bekerja sama dengan Perkumpulan Pengelola Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia dan Pengajarannya (PPJB-SIP is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Creative Commons License

Office: Simpang Alai, Cupak Tangah Pauh Limo, Padang 25162,

 

View My Stats