PROSES KOGNITIF DALAM LEGENDA JOKO TINGKIR Cognitive Process in Jaka Tingkir Legend
Abstract
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah merumuskan proses kognitif dalam legenda Joko Tingkir. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kualitatif. Jenis penelitian ini adalah grounded theory. Data penelitian ini adalah kata, kalimat, dan wacana yang menunjukkan proses kognitif di dalam legenda Joko Tingkir. Sumber data penelitian ini adalah legenda Joko Tingkir. Data diperoleh dengan cara wawancara. Data penelitian dianalisis dengan beberapa langkah. 1) Tokoh dan alur dalam legenda Joko Tingkir diklasifikasikan berdasarkan domain kognitif. 2) Hasil klasifikasi akan menunjukkan dominasi level berpikir. 3) Menetapkan kesesuaian proses kognitif dalam legenda Joko Tingkir terhadap level berpikir siswa. Penelitian ini menghasilkan pemetaan proses kognitif dalam legenda Joko Tingkir, yang meliputi domain memahami, mengaplikasikan, menganalisis, mengevaluasi, dan mencipta. Legenda Joko Tingkir didominasi oleh proses kognitif memahami. Bacaan ini lebih tepat mulai diberikan pada anak yang perkembangan kognitifnya telah mencapai tahap memahami. Apabila dikonversi dengan teori perkembangan kognitif yang dikemukakan oleh Piaget, proses kognitif memahami berada pada akhir tahap operasional konkret. Artinya, secara proses kognitif, legenda Joko Tingkir baru bisa diberikan kepada anak usia 10-11 tahun.
v>
The purpose of this research is formulate a cognitive process in the legend of Jaka Tingkir.The approach used in this research is qualitative. This research approach is qualitative. Thedata of this research are words, sentences, and discourses that show the cognitive processesin the legend of Jaka Tingkir. The primary data source of this research is the legend of JakaTingkir which comes from an interview with the caretaker of the Tomb of Need, the secondarydata source is a story book entitled Jaka Tingkir. The data collection technique was carriedout by interviewing the caretaker of the Tomb of Need in Plupuh, Sragen on October 16,2016 and intensive reading. The research data were analyzed by several steps. First, acomparative study was carried out between the Jaka Tingkir legend from primary andsecondary data sources. Second, the characters and plot in the Jaka Tingkir legend areclassified based on the cognitive domain. Third, the classification results will show thedominance of the level of thinking. Fourth, determine the cognitive processes that aredominant in the level of thinking. This research resulted in the mapping of cognitive processesin the Jaka Tingkir legend, which includes the domains of understanding, applying, analyzing,evaluating, and creating. The Jaka Tingkir legend is dominated by the cognitive process ofunderstanding. This reading is more appropriate starting to be given to children whosecognitive development has reached the stage of understanding. When converted to the theoryof cognitive development put forward by Piaget, the cognitive process of understanding is atthe end of the concrete operational stage.Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Ã, E. F., & Mamoura, M. (2008). Exploring Teachers ’ Value Orientations in Literature and History Secondary Classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1487–1501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.01.002
Avdikos, E. G. (2010). Continuity, Identity and Folk Studies in Greece. Estonian Folklore, 44, 157–170.
Berk, S., & Lillo-martin, D. (2012). The Two-word Stage : Motivated by Linguistic or Cognitive Constraints ? Cognitive Psychology, 65(1), 118–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.02.002
Boge, F. J. (2019). The best of many worlds , or , is quantum decoherence the manifestation of a disposition ? Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, (xxxx), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2019.02.001
Brophy-herb, H. E., Iglesias, M., Sieverson, C., Cuellar, P., & Álvarez, C. (2020). Children ’ s storybooks as a source of mental state references : Comparison between books from Chile , Colombia , Scotland and USA. Cognitive Development, 53(April 2019), 100845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2019.100845
Canning, P. (2017). Text World Theory and Real World Readers : From Literature to Life in a Belfast Prison. Language and Literature, 26(2), 172– 187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947017704731
Daiute, C., & Lee, C. D. (2019). Studying Cognitive Development in Digital Playgrounds. Cognitive Development, 49, 51–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.11.007
Darda, K. M., Butler, E. E., & Ramsey, R. (2020). Individual Differences in Social and Non-Social Cognitive Control. Cognition, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104317
Deringer, S. A. (2017). Mindful Place-Based Education : Mapping the Literature. Journal of Experiential Education, 0(0), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825917716694
Ding, E. (2009). Metaphor and Culture. Asian Social Science, 5(1), 47–69.
Ejova, A., & Ohtsuka, K. (2019). Erroneous Gambling-Related Beliefs Emerge from Broader Beliefs During Problem-Solving : a Critical Review and Classification Scheme. Thinking & Reasoning, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2019.1590233
Gleitman, L. R., & Trueswell, J. C. (2018). Easy Words : Reference Resolution in a Malevolent Referent World. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12352
Goldstein, T. R., & Bloom, P. (2014). Characterizing Characters : How Children Make Sense of Realistic Acting. Cognitive Development, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.12.001
Grosu, M. (2014). Folklore Archives and Constructions of the Positivist Paradigm. Philobiblon, XIX(2), 491–500. https://doi.org/10.4000/cem.
Gunzenhauser, C., Karbach, J., & Saalbach, H. (2019). Function of Verbal Strategies in Monolingual vs Bilingual Students ’ Planning Performance : An Experimental Approach. Cognitive Development, 50, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2019.01.003
Hogg, L. (2011). Funds of Knowledge : An Investigation of Coherence Within the Literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(3), 666–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.11.005
Huda, M. (2018a). Blended Learning : Improvisasi dalam Pembelajaran Menulis Pengalaman. Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, Dan Budaya, 8(2), 117–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26714/lensa.8.2.2018.117-130
Huda, M. (2018b). Strategi Berpikir Integratif dalam Pembelajaran Membaca Lintas Kurikulum di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Kredo, 1(2), 26–35. https://doi.org/ttps://doi.org/10.24176/kredo.v1i2.1995
Huda, M. (2019). Dinamika Sosial dalam Novel Pencari Harta Karun dan Five on A Hike Together. Bahasa dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Pengajarannya, 47(1), 36–43.
Huda, M., Ghazali, A. S., Siswanto, W., & Hasanah, M. (2019). Cognitive Level of Characters in the Indonesian Novel As a Source of Learning. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(5), 931–952. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.623308
Iii, J. M. H., Potts, C. A., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2016). Cognitive Framing in Action. Cognition, 151, 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.02.015
Ivey, B. (2011). Values and Value in Folklore. Journal of American Folklore, 124(491), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1353/jaf.2011.0014
Jimenez, R., & Saylor, M. M. (2017). Preschoolers’ Word Learning and Story Comprehension During Shared Book Reading. Cognitive Development Journal, 44, 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.08.011
Krathwohl, L. W. A. D. (Ed.). (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational of Objectives. New York: Longman.
Langus, A., & Nespor, M. (2010). Cognitive Systems Struggling for Word Order. Cognitive Psychology, 60(4), 291–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.01.004
Lidz, J. (2019). Learning , Memory , and Syntactic Bootstrapping : A Meditation. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12411
Monaghan, P., & Roberts, S. G. (2019). Cognitive in Fluences in Language Evolution: Psycholinguistic Predictors of Loan Word Borrowing. Cognition, 186, 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.02.007
Nijhof, A. D., Shapiro, K. L., & Catmur, C. (2020). No Evidence for a Common Self-bias Across Cognitive Domains. Cognition Journal, 197, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104186
Paulus, M., Schuwerk, T., Sodian, B., & Ganglmayer, K. (2017). Children’ s and Adults ’ Use of Verbal Information to Visually Anticipate Others ’ Actions : A Study on Explicit and Implicit Social-Cognitive Processing. Cognition, 160, 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.12.013
Pennebaker, J. W., & Martha, E. (2010). Cognition and Emotion Cognitive , Emotional , and Language Processes in Disclosure. Cognition and Emotion, 10(6), 601–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999396380079
Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2014). The Role of Analytic Thinking in Moral Judgements and Values. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 188–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2013.865000
Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2015). Emotion and Persuasion : Cognitive and Metacognitive Processes Impact Attitudes. Cognition and Emotion, 29(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.967183
Potters, J. (2019). Heuristics versus norms : On the relativistic responses to the Kaufmann experiments. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 66, 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2018.10.011
Rosaler, J., & Harlander, R. (2019). Naturalness , Wilsonian renormalization , and “ fundamental parameters ” in quantum fi eld theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, (xxxx), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2018.12.003
Souto-manning, M. (2012). On Children as Syncretic Natives : Disrupting and Moving Beyond Normative Binaries. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 13(3), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798412455035
Sowden, P. T., Pringle, A., & Gabora, L. (2015). The Shifting Sands of Creative Thinking: Connections to Dual- Process Theory. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2014.885464
Stumm, S. Von. (2018). Feeling Low, Thinking Slow? Associations between Situational Cues, Mood, and Cognitive Function. Cognition and Emotion, 0(0), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2017.1420632
Sudewa, I. K. (2014). Transformasi Sastra Lisan Ke Dalam Seni Pertunjukan Di Bali: Perspektif Pendidikan. Jurnal Humaniora, 26(1), 65–73.
Thompson, V. A., Johnson, S. C., Thompson, V. A., & Johnson, S. C. (2014). Conflict, Metacognition, and Analytic Thinking. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 215–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2013.869763
Thompson, V. A., Turner, J. A. P., & Pennycook, G. (2011). Intuition, Reason, and Metacognition. Cognitive Psychology, 63(3), 107–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.06.001
Tolić, M. (2011). Media Culture and Media Education in Modern School. World Journal of Education, 1(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v1n2p89
Verhallen, M. J. A. J. (2011). Young Second Language Learners ’ Visual Attention to Illustrations in Storybooks. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 11(4), 480–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798411416785
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26499/salingka.v17i2.423
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 SALINGKA
Salingka publish by Balai Bahasa Provinsi Sumatera Barat - Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa bekerja sama dengan Perkumpulan Pengelola Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia dan Pengajarannya (PPJB-SIP is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Office: Simpang Alai, Cupak Tangah Pauh Limo, Padang 25162,